Introducing the GPS jury 2025
This year’s GPS jury, namely researcher Siphokazi Tau, consultant and project manager Musonda Chimba, and curator Uthando Baduza, would like to extend their gratitude to all GPS applicants who have put great labour and care into their GPS project proposals. The task of choosing three outstanding proposals to be funded within the GPS programme wasn’t an easy one.
Jury statement 2025
The jury found that the proposals, on an artistic level, demonstrated an appealing mix of grounded experience and bold new voices which made it challenging for the jury to arrive at their decision. The three chosen projects prioritize marginalized histories and endangered cultural practices. All of them speak to how technology and contemporary practice can be a vehicle for archiving and to help capturing these marginalized stories. The selected projects show a good relationship between past/present/future, and strongly centre the community in the conceptualization and the making of the project, which is vital for a GPS project.
With their selection, the jury also prioritised projects that demonstrate potential for sustainable impact. The three projects recognize the significance of the physical and cultural space where they are embedded and appreciate the richness of these spaces as reservoirs of cultural knowledge.
On a broader scale, the jury would like to make the following comments on the received project proposals:
This year, the Goethe-Institut received a high number of arts education proposals which speaks to a vital need articulated by the arts community in their respective locations. The jury appreciates that practitioners are working hard at this crucial grassroots level in order to provide access to the arts for the most marginalized in our communities, and to lay the foundation for growing our future generations.
Some proposals demonstrated a lack of connection and clear links and/or partnerships rooted in the respective community (especially in the case of project ideas that foreground personal (hi)stories and personal artistic journeys). Many projects showed great experimental value, but often their outlined project plans didn’t clearly articulate their means of realization.
The jury positively acknowledges the rich diversity of proposals in terms of themes – spanning from those foregrounding heritage and indigenous practices to those that use AI technologies.
Upon this basis, the jury would like to make the following recommendations:
Future GPS proposals should demonstrate more clearly how they intend to connect to the community where the project is envisioned to take place. They ideally should show rootedness within, and partnership with those communities. It is fundamental for a GPS proposal to outline how the community can benefit from the project.
Confirmed partnerships upon submission of the project proposal are vital, so is clarity with regards to the project implementation. A solid project plan is essential.
Ideally, the proposals should articulate more clearly what the significance of the space is for their respective project.